Respond to this Question
Similar Questions

Philosophy
How would you construct a proof to show that the following arguments are valid? 
Philosophy  HELP
How would you construct a proof to show that the following arguments are valid? 
Math
Construct a truth table for the statement. (p ↔ q) → p 
Math
Construct a truth table for the statement. (p ↔ q) → p 
chemical reaction engineering
Propane steam reforming over an alumina supported Ni metal catalyst: C3H8 (g) + H2O (g) → CO2 (g) + H2 (g) is proposed to follow these mechanisms: C3H8 + 2S1 ↔ C2H5S1 + CH3S1 (M1) H2O + 2S2 ↔ OHS2 + HS2 (M2) CH3S1 … 
Chem
At 298 K, Pb(IO3)2(s) ↔ Pb2+(aq) + 2IO3(aq) Ksp = 2.6x 1013 Pb2+(aq) + 2e → Pb(s) Eo = (0.126) V. Find the standard potential of the halfreaction: Pb(IO3)2(s) + 2e ↔ Pb(s) + 2IO3(aq) Eo = ? 
Logic
Given the premises (p ⇒ q) and (r ⇒ s), use Propositional Resolution to prove the conclusion (p ∨ r ⇒ q ∨ s). Proof takes 8 steps including the premises and the goal. 
chemistry
Write both Kc and kp for the following reversible reactions: (wdp pg. 738) 2SO2(g) + O2(g) ↔ 2SO3(g) 2NH3(g) + H2SO4(l) ↔ (NH4)2SO4(s) S(s) + H2SO3(aq) ↔ H2S2O3(aq) 
Discrete Math!
Hi, How would you go about showing that the proposition below is a tautology using algebraic manipulation of logical equivalences (not using a truth table)? 
Math!
Hi, How would you go about showing that the proposition below is a tautology using algebraic manipulation of logical equivalences (not using a truth table)?