Philosophy

posted by .

Show that (P → Q) ↔ (¬P ∨ Q) in fitch

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. Philosophy

    How would you construct a proof to show that the following arguments are valid?
  2. Philosophy - HELP

    How would you construct a proof to show that the following arguments are valid?
  3. Math

    Construct a truth table for the statement. (p ↔ q) → p
  4. Math

    Construct a truth table for the statement. (p ↔ q) → p
  5. chemical reaction engineering

    Propane steam reforming over an alumina supported Ni metal catalyst: C3H8 (g) + H2O (g) → CO2 (g) + H2 (g) is proposed to follow these mechanisms: C3H8 + 2S1 ↔ C2H5-S1 + CH3-S1 (M1) H2O + 2S2 ↔ OH-S2 + H-S2 (M2) CH3-S1 …
  6. Chem

    At 298 K, Pb(IO3)2(s) ↔ Pb2+(aq) + 2IO3-(aq) Ksp = 2.6x 10-13 Pb2+(aq) + 2e- → Pb(s) Eo = (-0.126) V. Find the standard potential of the half-reaction: Pb(IO3)2(s) + 2e- ↔ Pb(s) + 2IO3-(aq) Eo = ?
  7. Logic

    Given the premises (p ⇒ q) and (r ⇒ s), use Propositional Resolution to prove the conclusion (p ∨ r ⇒ q ∨ s). Proof takes 8 steps including the premises and the goal.
  8. chemistry

    Write both Kc and kp for the following reversible reactions: (wdp pg. 738) 2SO2(g) + O2(g) ↔ 2SO3(g) 2NH3(g) + H2SO4(l) ↔ (NH4)2SO4(s) S(s) + H2SO3(aq) ↔ H2S2O3(aq)
  9. Discrete Math!

    Hi, How would you go about showing that the proposition below is a tautology using algebraic manipulation of logical equivalences (not using a truth table)?
  10. Math!

    Hi, How would you go about showing that the proposition below is a tautology using algebraic manipulation of logical equivalences (not using a truth table)?

More Similar Questions