English
posted by m .
I am a bit stumped here. Working on syllogisms. To be a valid syllogism, the conclusion must be proven by the reasons. We are to decide if te following are valid or invalid.
1. All zebras are striped animals. No zebras are polar bears. Therefore, no polar bears are striped animals.
My answer Originally I was going to say valid but after breaking down the sentence I then see it as invalid.
2. All clowns are funny individuals. Some sad people are clowns. Therefore, some sad people are funny individuals.
My answerI feel this is valid.
Respond to this Question
Similar Questions

math
Can someone explain this to me. Determine if each conclusion is valid or invalid for the given statements. a. Some expensive books are mystery books. All mystery books are interesting. Conclusion: Some interesting books are expensive. … 
Critical Thinking
All flies are winged creatures. All butterflies are winged creatures Therefore, all butterflies are flies I believe this is an invalid syllogism, not 100% sure. Can you explain why it would be valid or invalid please 
English
1. A poll of five thousand people has indicated that 57 percent of the nation drinks juice for breakfast every day. A. inductive reasoning B. deductive reasoning C. valid but untrue syllogism D. reductive reasoning I think it's A? 
math
please help... determine if the argument is valid or invalid along with the appropriate form of argument. if harvard hustles then harvard wins harvard wins ___________________ harvard hustles are these statements: valid by law of detachment … 
math
Determine if the argument is valid or invalid. Give a reason to justify answer. If it is cold, then you need a coat. You do not need a coat. It is not cold. (Points : 2) Valid by the law of detachment Valid by the law of contraposition … 
college mathematics
Given the argument and its Euler diagram below, determine whether the syllogism is valid or in valid. All painters use brushes. Some people who use brushes are teachers. Some painters are teachers. (The second sentence is suppose to … 
english
hypothetical syllogisms can have two valid and two invalid structures. The two valid structures are affirming the antecedent or modus ponens and denying the consequent or modus tollens. The two invalid structures or fallacies are denying … 
EnglishMs. Sue please
hypothetical syllogisms can have two valid and two invalid structures. The two valid structures are affirming the antecedent or modus ponens and denying the consequent or modus tollens. The two invalid structures or fallacies are denying … 
MathSyllogism valid?
Some snakes are poisonous. A rattlesnake is a snake. Therefore: a rattlesnake is poisonous. Is syllogism valid or invalid? 
Math
If a rectangle has four congruent sides, it is a square. A square has perpendicular diagonals. Conclusion: A rectangle has diagonals that are always perpendicular. Which of the following is correct The conclusion is valid by the law …