posted by jon .
(a). Harveston asserted that Narnia’s service was invalid in part because “the return of service states that process was delivered to “JoAnn Kocerek” and did not show that she “had the authority to accept process on behalf of Harvestons or the Texas Securities Commissioner.” Should such a detail, if it is required, be strictly construed and applied? Explain why it should not apply in this case? Explain