statistics
posted by Anonymous .
(Blood Test Problem) Suppose 100 people are waiting for blood test for a kind of disease. The probability that for one person the test result is positive equals 0.1. Two test methods are as follows:
Method 1: Test one by one. Then we have to do 100 tests.
Method 2: Divide 100 people into 25 groups with 4 people in each. Then, mix 4 people’s blood and test. If the result is negative, then everyone in this group is negative. If the result is positive, then we test these 4 people one by one. Now, the number of tests becomes 1+4=5.
Question: Which method is better?

If they are both as accurate, which will involve fewer tests?
Respond to this Question
Similar Questions

Math
Police report that 88% of drivers stopped on suspicion of drunk driving are given a breath test, 15% a blood test, and 10% both tests. What is the probability that the next driver stopped on suspicion of drunk driving is given: i) … 
math
This is a statistics problem. A laboratory test for the detection of a certain disease give a positive result 5 percent of the time for people who do not have the disease. The test gives a negative result 0.3 percent of the time for … 
probability
A new test for detecting a disease has been developed. Medical trials show that 92% o patients with the disease show a positive test result. If 4% of the population have the disease, determine the probability (to 3 decimal places) … 
Science
A repair shop tested two methods(a & B) of replacing a broken roller. In testing method A, these times in minutes were measured (5 trials), 2,4,9,3,2. In testing methods B, these times in minutes were measured (6 trials), 3,7,5,8,4,3. … 
Probability
A screening test for a disease shows a positive test result in 95% of all cases when the disease is actually present and in 20% of all cases when it is not. When the test was administered to a large number of people, 21.5% of the results … 
statistics
A test designed to check for sicklecell anemia has an 85% chance of detection in that, if a person has the disease, there is an 85% chance that the test will be positive. And, if the person does not have the disease, there is an 85% … 
Maths
Suppose that the reliability of a HIV test is specified as follows: Of people having HIV, 90% of the test detect the disease but 10% go undetected. Of people free of HIV, 99% of the test are judged HIV–ive but 1% are diagnosed as … 
Maths
Suppose that the reliability of a HIV test is specified as follows: Of people having HIV, 90% of the test detect the disease but 10% go undetected. Of people free of HIV, 99% of the test are judged HIV–ive but 1% are diagnosed as … 
probability
Consider a medical screening excersis for a disease that in the case that indicte that 5 people of 1000 people screenedhave the disease.the screening process is known to give a false positive 3% at times and a false negative 1% at … 
Statistics
A certain disease occurs in 4% of the population. A blood test for this disease shows a false positive 12% of the time. That means a test will show positive given that the person does not have the disease. What is the probability that …