# Pyschology

posted by .

When a result is significant, explain why it is wrong to say the result “proves” the research hypothesis.

## Similar Questions

1. ### math-statistics

18) Which of the following is the most significant result?
2. ### Chem

Another confusing significant digit problem. I added 36.6 and 2.4, and divided the result by 4.803. The book says the answer is 7.91, but I don'[t see how that could be, since the lowest number of significant digits in the problem …
3. ### Statistics

Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result?
4. ### Statistics

What does it mean when a researcher chooses the cutoff in a comparison distribution to be .01?
5. ### Statistics

Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result?
6. ### Statistical application

Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result?
7. ### statistics

Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result?
8. ### pomona

Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result?
9. ### Statistics

Please help me understand this question. Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result?
10. ### psychology

A hypothesis is what an investigator uses to: duplicate research findings of other scientists. frame his/her research question. explain why he/she obtained a certain result from an experiment. define the parameters of a research study. …

More Similar Questions