Pyschology

posted by .

When a result is significant, explain why it is wrong to say the result “proves” the research hypothesis.

PLEASE HELP

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. math-statistics

    18) Which of the following is the most significant result?
  2. Chem

    Another confusing significant digit problem. I added 36.6 and 2.4, and divided the result by 4.803. The book says the answer is 7.91, but I don'[t see how that could be, since the lowest number of significant digits in the problem …
  3. Statistics

    Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result?
  4. Statistics

    What does it mean when a researcher chooses the cutoff in a comparison distribution to be .01?
  5. Statistics

    Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result?
  6. Statistical application

    Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result?
  7. statistics

    Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result?
  8. pomona

    Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result?
  9. Statistics

    Please help me understand this question. Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result?
  10. psychology

    A hypothesis is what an investigator uses to: duplicate research findings of other scientists. frame his/her research question. explain why he/she obtained a certain result from an experiment. define the parameters of a research study. …

More Similar Questions