I also have to write a question for my exam on "is it appropirate for social sciences to use the word 'abnormal' with mental illnesses. Explain"
I just need help with comming up with points
i was going to say no becauae
-it is just like any other illness
-they should not be condemmed for it
-they are able to function and live with it
any other ideas?! thanks!
I think "abnormal" is appropriate when it describes behavior that is not used by most people.
If using the statistical definition of abnormal, it just signifies a great difference from the mean of a normal distribution. Both mentally ed and intellectually gifted would be considered abnormal in terms of intelligence.
However, using a cultural definition, it describes extreme variation from cultural norms, regardless of what these norms are. In Hitler's Germany, people sympathetic to the plight of Jews would be considered abnormal. In the old South of the USA, those who helped free slaves were considered abnormal. The context of the abnormality needs to be considered.
I would also consider the effect of the abnormality on those close to the abnormal person.
The answer to this question is not clear, but trying to answer it will help you to become more familiar with the vagueness of the definition of abnormality.
Certainly! Here are a few additional points you could consider:
1. Stigmatization: Using the word "abnormal" to describe mental illnesses can perpetuate a negative stigma. It can imply that individuals with mental health conditions are fundamentally different or deviant from the norm, leading to discrimination and marginalization.
2. Medicalization: Mental illnesses are often conceptualized as medical conditions, just like physical illnesses, rather than as aberrations or abnormalities. This perspective recognizes that mental health conditions have underlying biological, psychological, and social factors, and should be treated with the same empathy and support as any other medical condition.
3. Subjectivity and Cultural Context: The term "abnormal" is subjective and varies across different cultures and societies. What is considered abnormal in one context may be normal in another. Using this term could undermine the understanding and cultural sensitivity necessary to address mental health issues across diverse populations.
4. Person-Centered Language: The use of person-centered language is important when discussing mental illnesses. It emphasizes that individuals with mental health conditions are people first, not defined solely by their conditions. Using terms like "abnormal" can detract from this person-centered approach.
5. Focus on Functioning: As you mentioned, people with mental health conditions can lead fulfilling and productive lives. Describing these conditions as "abnormal" can overshadow their ability to navigate their challenges, seek treatment, and contribute to society.
Remember, these points are just suggestions to help you develop your perspective. It's important to support your views with evidence and examples in your exam answer.