statistics
posted by Anonymous .
Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result? Give an example of how this might happen.

There was a study that found the height of various levels of executives was statistically significant, with taller persons having higher positions. However, the mean differences were only small fractions of an inch. How would that help you in hiring or promotions?
Respond to this Question
Similar Questions

Statistics
An agricultural field trial compares the yield of two varieties of tomatoes for commercial use. The researchers divide in half each of 10 small plots of land in different locations and plant each tomato variety on one half of each … 
Statistics
Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result? 
Statistics
Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result? 
Statistical application
Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result? 
Statistics
What are the steps espoused by Applied Statistics in Business and Economics for formal hypothesis testing? 
pomona
Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result? 
Statistics
Please help me understand this question. Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result? 
STATISTICS
A study examining the relationship between fetal Xray exposure and a particular type of childhood blood cancer found the following odds ratio (and 95% confidence interval) for the association: 2.44 (0.95 to 6.33). This result would … 
statistics
In a simple random sample of 250 fatherson pairs taken from a large population of such pairs, the mean height of the fathers is 68.5 inches and the SD is 2.5 inches; the mean height of the sons is 69 inches and the SD is 3 inches; … 
STATISTICS
A study examining the relationship between fetal Xray exposure and a particular type of childhood blood cancer found the following odds ratio (and 95% confidence interval) for the association: 2.44 (0.95 to 6.33). This result would …