How is FOLK music different from CLASSICAL music in South Asia?
That doesn't help I am still confused
You might begin with a good definition of each term. Folk music originates from among the common people in each region and is passed down orally. Classical music is more traditional, stylized, often coming from liturgical, secular music. It is passed down in a written form.
If you read each of the links it described the 3-tone melodies of the hill people, The music was more melodic.
The classican often had influences frm foreign music and ws more harmonic. There were good descriptions of the instruments used.
Sra
To understand the differences between FOLK music and CLASSICAL music in South Asia, it's important to first define what each genre entails.
FOLK music:
Folk music refers to the traditional music of a particular region or culture. It generally evolves organically and is passed down from generation to generation. Folk music often incorporates elements of the local language, cultural practices, and social themes. It is largely an oral tradition, with songs and melodies being sung or played by common people rather than trained musicians. In South Asia, folk music varies greatly across different regions, including countries like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nepal. The diversity of instruments, styles, and linguistic influences distinguishes folk music in South Asia.
CLASSICAL music:
Classical music, on the other hand, is a highly structured genre that follows established rules and traditions. It typically involves formal training and mastery of specific techniques. In South Asia, classical music is deeply influenced by two major traditions: Hindustani classical music, which is prominent in North India and Pakistan, and Carnatic classical music, which is popular in South India and Sri Lanka. Both traditions have their distinct set of ragas (melodic scales) and talas (rhythmic patterns). Classical music in South Asia generally involves intricate improvisation known as 'raga alapana', and showcases the virtuosity of performers on traditional instruments such as the sitar, sarod, tabla, and violin.
Now, let's explore the differences between FOLK and CLASSICAL music in South Asia:
1. Origins and Transmission: Folk music is rooted in the cultural heritage of a region, passed down through generations through oral tradition. Classical music, in contrast, is based on formal systems of notation and has historically been taught and learned through Guru-Shishya (teacher-student) relationships.
2. Structure and Complexity: Folk music tends to have simpler structures and focuses on storytelling and basic harmonies. Classical music, in contrast, is highly complex, with defined compositions, intricate melodic patterns, and sophisticated rhythmic structures.
3. Performance Context: Folk music is commonly performed in informal settings such as community gatherings, festivals, or social events. Classical music, on the other hand, is usually performed in concert halls or dedicated spaces, with a focus on the artist's virtuosity and the appreciation of the art form.
4. Improvisation: While both genres may allow for improvisation, it is more pronounced in classical music, where performers are expected to showcase their creativity within the established framework. Folk music often relies on the preservation of traditional songs and melodies without extensive improvisation.
5. Influence and Evolution: Folk music reflects the local cultural influences and traditions of a region. It is often less influenced by external factors and evolves slowly over time. Classical music, however, has seen influences from various cultures and has incorporated elements from different music traditions.
Understanding the differences between folk and classical music in South Asia requires examining their historical context, cultural significance, performance practices, and musical structures. By exploring these aspects, one can gain a deeper appreciation for the rich musical heritage of the region.