Statistical application

posted by .

Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result? Give an example of how this might happen.

  • Statistical application -

    You are asking if statistical significance may not be practically significant. Although I cannot cite the study, it found that, as you go up the executive ladder for business, people are taller. Does this justify promoting taller applicants, especially since the differences between levels are mere fractions of an inch?

    Can this help you think of your own example?

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. Statistics

    An agricultural field trial compares the yield of two varieties of tomatoes for commercial use. The researchers divide in half each of 10 small plots of land in different locations and plant each tomato variety on one half of each …
  2. Statistics

    Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result?
  3. Statistics

    Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result?
  4. statistics

    Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result?
  5. pomona

    Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result?
  6. Statistics

    Please help me understand this question. Can a hypothesis test yield a statistically significant (say p<=0.05), yet practically meaningless result?
  7. statistics

    . A professor is interested in knowing the correlation, if any, of students’ scores on the first and second exams given in his class. Test 1 Test 2 92 86 90 87 89 85 82 90 88 79 92 90 100 92 91 84 Is there a significant correlation?
  8. STATISTICS

    A study examining the relationship between fetal X-ray exposure and a particular type of childhood blood cancer found the following odds ratio (and 95% confidence interval) for the association: 2.44 (0.95 to 6.33). This result would …
  9. STATISTICS

    A study examining the relationship between fetal X-ray exposure and a particular type of childhood blood cancer found the following odds ratio (and 95% confidence interval) for the association: 2.44 (0.95 to 6.33). This result would …
  10. Quantitative Analysis

    Under conditions where a large sample is used in experimental research, and "power" of a statistical test is maximized, it is possible to have statistically significant results, yet a fairly small...?

More Similar Questions