CRT

posted by .

Identify at least two arguments in the article. Outline the premises and conclusions of each argument you find. Then, answer the following questions for each argument, making sure to explain how you arrived at your answers.


o Do the premises sufficiently support the conclusions?
o Are the arguments either deductively valid or inductively strong, or are they invalid or weak?
o Are the premises true or plausibly true, or are they difficult to prove?

  • CRT -

    Please note that we don't do students' homework for them. Be sure to go back into your textbook or use a good search engine. http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/

    Once YOU have come up with attempted answers to YOUR questions, please re-post and let us know what you think. Then someone here will be happy to comment on your thinking.

  • CRT -

    ok thank you for the link.

  • CRT -

    You're welcome. Let us know what you come up with if you'd like feedback from someone here.

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. Philosophy

    What is the meaning of validity, truth, and soundness as they relate to the area of logical syllogisms?
  2. English

    Can some one please check this assignment for me. I would certainly appreciate it Thanks Danielle Argument Evaluation Answer the following questions for each argument, making sure to explain how you arrived at your answers. o Do the …
  3. crt

    Fill in the blanks where called for, and answer true or false where appropriate. 1. Valid arguments are said to be strong or weak. 2. Valid arguments are always good arguments. 3. Sound arguments are ________ arguments whose premises …
  4. Assignment Arguement Evaluation

    identify at least two arguments in the article.Outline the premises and the conlusions of each argument you find. then, answer the questions for each argument, making sure to explain how you arrived at your answer.
  5. CRT 205

    Imagine your child is trying to prove that she did not steal chocolate chip cookies from the cookie jar, so she makes this argument: ―There are no chocolate stains on my hands, so I couldn’t have stolen the cookies.‖ …
  6. CRT 205

    • Read the article “Controlling Irrational Fears After 9/11” on pp. 456–458 of Appendix 1. • Identify at least two arguments in the article. Outline the premises and conclusions of each argument you find. Then, answer the …
  7. critical thinking

    i have to read an article"Controlling Irrational fears after 9/11" how do i identify two arguments in the article and outline the premises and the conclusion of each argument
  8. Crt/205 Critical Thinking

    I need help with this assignment: Argument Evaluation DUE: Day 7 Points: 100 · Read the essay “Bush’s Environmental Record” by Bob Herbert found in the “Appendix 1”, pgs. 461-462. To find this, click on the “Controlling …
  9. CRT 205

    Assignment: Argument Evaluation · Read the article “Controlling Irrational Fears After 9/11” on pp. 456–458 of Appendix 1. · Identify at least two arguments in the article. Outline the premises and conclusions of each argument …
  10. Geometry... Please help soon!

    Write four arguments that meet the following criteria: Argument 1: The argument has a false premise, but follows good logic. Argument 2: The argument has true premises, but follows poor logic, leading to a false conclusion. Argument …

More Similar Questions