Multiple choice Q.
The discretionary power of judges is less tan that of elected officials because judges:
A> are prohibited from relying on personal judgment when deciding as issue
B> must make decisions that can be justified in terms of existing provisions of the law
C> ae prhibited from addressing issues without the permission of elected officials
D> are prohibited from taking into account the political consuquences of a decision
We will be glad to give you suggestions AFTER you have answered the questions.
I am going to say b
To determine the correct answer, we need to understand the meaning of discretionary power and compare it to the roles of judges and elected officials.
Discretionary power refers to the authority or freedom given to individuals to make decisions based on their own judgment and without strict guidelines or specific instructions. It allows them to consider various factors and circumstances to make choices that are not explicitly determined or dictated by existing laws or regulations.
Judges are appointed to interpret and apply the law in legal proceedings. Elected officials, on the other hand, are individuals who are elected into office and have the authority to make and implement laws and policies.
Now, let's evaluate the given options:
A> are prohibited from relying on personal judgment when deciding as an issue
This option contradicts the idea of discretionary power. If judges were prohibited from relying on personal judgment, they would not have discretionary power. Therefore, this option is unlikely to be correct.
B> must make decisions that can be justified in terms of existing provisions of the law
This option suggests that judges have to base their decisions on the existing provisions of the law. While judges do need to ensure that their decisions are legally justifiable, this does not necessarily restrict their discretionary power. Judges can still exercise discretion within the framework of the law. This option seems more plausible.
C> are prohibited from addressing issues without the permission of elected officials
This option implies that judges cannot address or decide on issues without the approval of elected officials. This would severely limit their discretionary power. However, judges often have the authority to address and decide on legal matters independently, so this option is less likely to be correct.
D> are prohibited from taking into account the political consequences of a decision
This option suggests that judges cannot consider the political consequences of their decisions. If judges were restricted from considering political consequences, it would impact their discretionary power. However, judges are expected to base their decisions on legal principles rather than political considerations. This option is also possible.
Based on the analysis, the most fitting answer that explains the limitations on judges' discretionary power is:
B> must make decisions that can be justified in terms of existing provisions of the law