when north carolina decided to reorganize after the hillsborough convention, what change did they make and why? why were some critical of this decision?
When North Carolina decided to reorganize after the Hillsborough Convention in 1789, they made the significant change of ratifying the United States Constitution. The Hillsborough Convention was called to consider ratifying the newly proposed Constitution.
The state of North Carolina had initially been hesitant to ratify the Constitution due to concerns regarding the protection of individual rights. However, during the Hillsborough Convention, arguments in favor of ratification prevailed, and North Carolina became the 12th state to approve the Constitution on November 21, 1789.
This decision to ratify the Constitution had several implications. First, it solidified North Carolina's participation in the federal system and ensured its inclusion in the newly formed United States. Second, it established the Constitutional framework that outlined the powers and limitations of the federal government and protected the individual rights of citizens.
Despite the decision to ratify, there were some who remained critical of this choice. Opponents, known as the Anti-Federalists, argued that the Constitution did not adequately protect individual liberties and worried about the consolidation of power at the federal level. They believed that the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights to secure and guarantee individual freedoms. These concerns eventually led to the addition of the Bill of Rights, which addressed their apprehensions.
To learn more about this topic, you can consult historical records, documents, and books that discuss the Hillsborough Convention, the debates leading to North Carolina's decision to ratify the Constitution, and the opposition's arguments against it. Additionally, researching primary sources, such as letters and speeches from the time, can provide further insights into the motivations and viewpoints of those involved.