I am new at debate and i need help on the new CX debate cause i have a 6 weeks grade and the teacher wont help me so i need help writing an affermative CX case on RESOLVED: the united states federal government should substantually increase alternative energy incentives to the united states
As you prepare your debate, you'll need to list your arguments clearly and succinctly. Then anticipate how the other team will attempt to refute your arguments and prepare defenses for them. In addition, anticipate your opponents points and prepare questions about them.
This site may also help.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=CX+debate
This site should provide you with some help on your argument.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=US+++govt.should++increase+alternative+energy+incentives+&btnG=Search
Sure, I can help you with that! Constructing a CX (Cross-Examination) case for the resolution "Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase alternative energy incentives to the United States" involves several steps. Let's break it down:
Step 1: Understand the resolution
To start, read and understand the resolution carefully. Familiarize yourself with key terms such as "alternative energy incentives" and "substantially increase." This will give you a clear understanding of what you are affirming and allow you to develop arguments surrounding alternative energy.
Step 2: Research alternative energy
Begin by researching various alternative energy sources, such as solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, or bioenergy. Gather information about their benefits, effectiveness, and potential impacts. Keep track of specific incentives that the government currently offers for alternative energy, as well as any limitations or gaps in the current system.
Step 3: Develop your arguments
Now it's time to develop your affirmative case. Generally, a CX case consists of a value premise, contentions, and supporting evidence. Here's an example structure for your case:
Value premise: Start by introducing the core value or principle that you believe increasing alternative energy incentives would promote. For instance, it could be "Environmental sustainability" or "Energy independence."
Contention 1: Present your first main argument. For example, you can argue that increasing alternative energy incentives would reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change. Support this contention with evidence such as statistics on how alternative energy sources are cleaner and more sustainable compared to fossil fuels like coal or oil.
Contention 2: Introduce another argument, such as enhancing economic growth and job creation. Explain how increasing alternative energy incentives would stimulate the renewable energy sector, leading to new job opportunities and economic benefits. Support this contention with studies or reports that highlight the potential economic advantages of investing in alternative energy.
Contention 3: Build a third argument, such as reducing reliance on foreign oil. Explain how increasing alternative energy incentives would promote energy independence and reduce the nation's vulnerability to fluctuations in global energy markets. Back up this contention with evidence that shows the current level of foreign oil dependence and the benefits of transitioning to domestic alternative energy sources.
Step 4: Anticipate counterarguments and prepare responses
Consider potential counterarguments against your case, such as cost concerns, reliability issues, or the impact on certain industries. Brainstorm and research responses to these counterarguments to strengthen your case and be more prepared during the cross-examination portion of the debate.
Step 5: Organize and finalize your case
Compile your arguments, evidence, and responses into a cohesive case. Make sure your points are clear, logical, and supported by evidence. Organize your case in a manner that flows logically from one contention to the next.
Remember, this is just a basic structure to help you get started. Feel free to modify or expand upon it based on your research and personal style. Good luck with your debate!