# science

posted by .

I did this experiment and I found these validity issues: they never specified if temperature to be measured in celcius or faren., they never mentioned that the buckets were to be the same, stirring until your arms get tired is not a good idea, but I need three more validity issues?????

DO you consider the companys conclusion valid? How could them improve?

To prevent future brownfield sites the DEP's concer lies in the fact that the chemical in the wastewater eventually reaches natural waterways and affects drinking water. It decided to test the temperatureeffects of a chemial to the natural water that could be contaminating.
Their experiment was based on this statement: We are trying to determine if adding chamiall X to stream water causes the stream water to rise in temperature.

HEre is the procedure:
1. Take two buckets and fill each one about halfway with tap water.
2. Record the temperature of each bucket of water.
3. Put a shovel full of chemical into bucket number 1 and stir until arms get tired. Record the temperature.
4. Put 2 shovel fulls in bucket number two and record temperature.
So it again for accurate results.
Graph and make conclusion

In one bucket the temperature increased from 15 to 35 degrees and in the other bucket the temperature increased from 15 to 37 degrees. They concluded the chemical was responsible for temperature rise.

• science -

In 1, not only do they not specify the size of the buckets BUT they also say "FILL ABOUT HALFWAY WITH TAP WATER." The exact amount of water should be stated. Second, is tap water the same as "stream water."

In 2. T in C or F you have.
In 3. A shovel full of chemical is not precise enough. The researcher should specify the amount of chemical added. The researcher should specify over what period of time the chemical is added. Also, a specific amount of time should be given. Stirring until arms get tired is not good enough since that would vary depending upon whose arms we were using.

I would add one more to the steps above. Since the initial statement was that they were trying to determine if chemical X caused a rise in the termperature of stream water, my answer would be, "So what?" Whether the chemical raises the temperature of stream water has nothing to do with the wastewater eventually reaching streams. Why? One could argue that even if adding a chemical to waste water raised the temperature of the wastewater, letting that wastewater cool ( in air) before dumping it into a stream would not raise the temperature of the stream. My point in the last argument is that this experiment will NOT tell them anything they want to know.

## Respond to this Question

 First Name School Subject Your Answer

## Similar Questions

1. ### Science

Doing an experiment to find the solubility of calcium carbonate in 100 ml of water. The experiment is using water temp 20 degrees and 35 degrees celcius and also using slow and fast stirring speeds. How many variables are being used?
2. ### science experiment

See the question from earlier regarding how many variables are in the experiment. I think speed of stirring is a variable. So, my answer would be 3 variables. One for water temp., speed of stirring, and the calcium carbonate solubility. …
3. ### science

I did this experiment and I found these validity issues: they never specified if temperature to be measured in celcius or faren., they never mentioned that the buckets were to be the same, stirring until your arms get tired is not …
4. ### physics

A construction worker uses a steep tape to measure the length of an aluminum support column. If the measured length is 18.700 m when the temperature is 21.2 degrees celcius, what is the measured length when the temperature rises to …
5. ### English

What do you think Keats means in these lines from "When I Have Fears That I May Cease to Be"?
6. ### Calculus

The celcius scale is devised so that 0 degrees celcius is the freezing point of water ( at 1 atmosphere of pressure) and 100 degrees celcius is the boiling point of water ( at 1 atmosphere of pressure) . If you are more familiar with …
7. ### English

Never belong, never guess, never confess is an example of: a. repetition b. parallelism c. rhyme scheme d. assonance I think it's B but I'm not sure.
8. ### Science

Salim added 1 g of salt to each of four beakers filled with water. He stirred the water at different speeds, and recorded how long it took for the salt to dissolved. Stirring Time (sec) No stirring 25 Slow stirring 18 Medium stirring …
9. ### Science

Salim added 1 g of salt to each of four beakers filled with water. He stirred the water at different speeds, and recorded how long it took for the salt to dissolved. Stirring - Time (sec) No stirring - 25 Slow stirring - 18 Medium …
10. ### Statistics

2. (TCO 5) A company produces electronic equipments claims that 98% of their products never need any kind of maintenance. We selected 10 of their products and we wanted to know the probability that 8 of them never need maintenance. …

More Similar Questions