Discuss a minimum of two reasons why Jackson Pollock's Convergence (p. 510, Figure 734), is a work of "fine art" as opposed to an arbitrary composition of paint.
Imagine that you are a defense attorney for this work of art. Establish a very strong "argument" for this artwork by first establishing what defines "fine art." Support your argument with research. In addition, consider what influenced the artist to create work like Convergence, and discuss how this work fits into the specific era, and the specific movement from which it comes.
If you use additional sources use reliable/credible sources (retail sites are not considered reliable resources). All writing must be in your own words. Do not cut and paste information from any website
Here are some sites on Pollack and what has influenced his art.
(Broken Link Removed)
http://fractalog.squarespace.com/fractalog_blog/2006/3/24/splattery-will-get-you-somewhere-fractal-forgery.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_Pollock
http://www.albrightknox.org/ArtStart/Pollock_l.html
You might also see if you can get a copy of this thesis from Harvard:
The first Crite Prize goes to Daniel Hobin, concentrator in studio arts, film, and photography. Hobin's thesis, "Conflict and Convergence: A Study of the Synthesis of Opposites in Jackson Pollock's Art," was directed by Harry A. Cooper, associate curator of Modern Art in the Harvard University Art Museums and lecturer on the history of art and architecture. Cooper praised the thesis as "a thoughtful and original contribution to the Jackson Pollock literature. It extends the Jungian school of interpretation beyond iconography to basic matters of pictorial organization, and it successfully locates the meanings thus discovered both in universal psychological themes and in the immediate social and intellectual milieu of postwar America."
As an AI bot, I can provide you with an argument outlining why Jackson Pollock's Convergence can be considered a work of "fine art" rather than an arbitrary composition of paint. To do so, it's important to establish the definition and criteria of fine art.
Fine art is generally characterized by its aesthetic value, skillful execution, and expressive qualities. It is often created with the intention of evoking emotions, challenging conventions, and provoking intellectual thought. Now, let's delve into two reasons why Convergence fulfills these criteria and can be seen as a fine art piece.
1. Aesthetic Value: Convergence demonstrates a notable aesthetic value through its visual impact and composition. The painting features a dynamism created by intricate brushwork, lively drips, and a complex layering of colors. The patterns formed on the canvas provide a visually stimulating experience, capturing the viewer's attention and encouraging a deeper exploration of the artwork. Its abstract nature allows for individual interpretation, inviting the viewer to engage with the painting on a subjective level.
Furthermore, Convergence embodies the essence of abstract expressionism, a significant artistic movement in the mid-20th century, characterized by its emphasis on subjective emotional expression. Pollock's unique approach to painting, known as "drip painting" or "action painting," allowed him to create a sense of energy and movement on the canvas. By employing this technique, he sought to move beyond representational art, focusing on the act of creation itself and capturing the spontaneity of the artistic process. Convergence stands as a prime example of Pollock's exploration of this expressive style, communicating a sense of chaos, rhythm, and emotional intensity.
2. Skillful Execution: At first glance, Convergence may appear as a random splattering of paint; however, a closer analysis reveals the deliberate and skillful execution behind its creation. Pollock possessed a high level of technical proficiency, as he carefully controlled the flow of paint and the precision of his gestures to achieve the desired effect. Each drip, stroke, and movement was deliberately orchestrated, showcasing his expertise in manipulating paint and form.
To support this argument, you can refer to art historians and critics who recognize the technical prowess displayed in Pollock's work. For instance, influential art critic Clement Greenberg viewed Pollock's technique as a conscious and controlled artistic approach, demonstrating mastery over his materials. This level of control is clearly evident in Convergence, where Pollock dynamically arranges various gestures and marks to create a cohesive yet complex composition.
In conclusion, Jackson Pollock's Convergence can be defended as fine art due to its aesthetic value, skillful execution, and its place within the abstract expressionism movement. By presenting visually striking and emotionally evocative qualities, along with Pollock's deliberate and controlled technique, Convergence exemplifies the characteristics that define fine art.