Can you help with this question?
Please give your opinion.
Appropriate cooking methods are
cost-efficient because:
1.food expansion is minimized.
2.waste due to undercooked food
is minimized.
3.nutrients are conserved.
would 1 be the best answer?
I am not sure about the meaning of "food expansion" in (1). but i do think nutrients can be conserved if the cooking methods is appropriate.For some veg/fruits, appropriate cooking may also increase the nutrients.for example cooking tomatoes.
can someone else give help,please
There is only one reason to eat: Nutrients. There is only one reason to cook: Provide nutrients that are not destroyed, whilst making food palatable.
nutrients are conserved
NO #2 is the best answer since the waste due to undercooked food is minimized so the rest of the food will feed off the heat and fully cook.
To determine the best answer among the given options, let's examine each option and assess its validity:
1. Food expansion is minimized: This statement refers to the amount of expansion or increase in volume that food undergoes during cooking. While it is true that some cooking methods, such as boiling or steaming, may cause food to expand, this expansion does not directly indicate whether the cooking method is cost-efficient or not. Therefore, this option does not provide a strong argument for cost-efficiency.
2. Waste due to undercooked food is minimized: Undercooking food can lead to foodborne illnesses, resulting in wasted food and potential health risks. However, the minimization of waste due to undercooked food does not necessarily relate to cost efficiency. It primarily addresses food safety concerns.
3. Nutrients are conserved: This statement focuses on the preservation of nutrients during the cooking process. Proper cooking techniques, such as steaming or stir-frying, can help retain the nutritional value of the food. As nutrients play a crucial role in maintaining good health, conserving them is important from both a nutritional and a cost-efficiency perspective.
Based on the given options, the third choice, "nutrients are conserved," would be the most relevant answer in terms of cost efficiency. However, it is important to note that this is a subjective question and requires an individual's opinion. Additionally, it is always advisable to consult scientific research or reputable sources to gather more information on this topic.