dissonance : resonace ::
harh : rich
music : polyphony
polyphony : instrument
cacophony : telepragh
I presume you mean "harsh" not harh.
So, to do an analogy, you really need to understand the meanings of all the words involved. Do you know what dissonance and resonance mean? If not, please look them up in dictionary, which you can get on line very easily. Then, once you know what they mean, you can figure out how they related to each other. Let me know if you are still having trouble.
Dissonance : Resonance :: Harsh : Rich :: Music : Polyphony :: Polyphony : Instrument :: Cacophony : Telegraph
The correct analogy is: dissonance : resonance :: cacophony : polyphony.
Dissonance and resonance are both terms used in music theory. Dissonance refers to the clash or tension between musical notes, while resonance refers to the quality of sound produced by an instrument or voice when it amplifies or intensifies certain frequencies.
Similarly, cacophony and polyphony are also musical terms. Cacophony refers to a harsh and discordant combination of sounds, while polyphony refers to the texture of music that involves multiple independent melodies or voices sounding together.
Therefore, the analogy suggests that dissonance is to resonance as cacophony is to polyphony, as they all represent contrasting concepts within the realm of music.
You are correct, the correct word is "harsh" instead of "harh." Thank you for catching that.
Now, let's analyze the analogy:
dissonance : resonance
Dissonance refers to a lack of harmony or a harsh combination of sounds. Resonance, on the other hand, refers to the quality of a sound being amplified or reinforced. These terms are typically used in the context of music or sound waves.
Now, let's look at the answer choices:
A. harsh : rich
B. music : polyphony
C. polyphony : instrument
D. cacophony : telegraph
To find the correct analogy, we need to identify a relationship similar to that between dissonance and resonance.
Option A, "harsh : rich," does not exhibit a similar relationship. Harsh and rich do not have a contrasting or amplifying relationship like dissonance and resonance.
Option B, "music : polyphony," has a potential relationship. Polyphony refers to a style of music that involves multiple independent melodic lines. Just like how dissonance is the opposite of resonance in terms of harmonious sound, polyphony is the opposite of a single melodic line in music.
Option C, "polyphony : instrument," does not exhibit a similar relationship. Polyphony is a musical style, while an instrument is a tool or device used to produce sound. The relationship between these two terms is not one of contrast or amplification.
Option D, "cacophony : telegraph," does not exhibit a similar relationship. Cacophony refers to a harsh or discordant mixture of sounds, while a telegraph is a technology used for long-distance communication. The relationship between these two terms is not one of contrast or amplification.
Therefore, the correct analogy is B. music : polyphony, as polyphony is to music what dissonance is to resonance.