Post a New Question

Ethical Dilemma

posted by .

How would the consequentialist and the non-consequentialist respond to reporting child abuse without clear proof, just out of "gut" instinct.

The non-consequenialist reports , or does not report, without thought or care of the consequents to those involved.
The consequenialist labours in deep thought over the consequents to those parties, with either outcome: whether the abuse is true or untrue.

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

More Related Questions

Post a New Question