opinion question

posted by .

I am not quite sure what I think about this.

Television has been influential in United States presidential elections since the 1960's. But just what is this influence, and how has it affected who is elected? Has it made elections fairer and more accessible, or has it moved candidates from pursuing issues to pursuing image?

Would you defend or challenge the claim that television has had a positive impact on presidential elections?

I would challenge it. We seem to have had better presidents before "how you look on TV" and big-budget Big Lie character-smearing TV ad campaigns made the difference in who got elected, as well as the nomination process. The party conventions have become nothing more then chances for the two major parties to get free TV time and numb the populace with boring button-pushing speeches. The nominees are always determined beforehand.

Then there is the whole issue of the effect of biased reporting of Fox Cable News. That basically proves my point, in my opinion.

I agree with Drwls. Probably the fairest media information about candidates and elections came from newspapers and radio before the existence of TV. Nearly everyone who had electricity or a battery-powered radio could hear the candidates. Would Lincoln, with his homely face, or Franklin Roosevelt, in a wheel chair, have been elected if they'd been exposed to TV coverage?



I have this same promt for an essay tommorow!

  • opinion question -

    blah

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. business- opinion question

    Hey. I don't really have an opinion on this, so just seeing what everyone else thinks. Do you think the United States should trade with China or other countries with a poor human rights record?
  2. ap us gov and politics

    In the last half of the twentieth century, voter turnout in federal elections has declined. During the same period, voter turnout has been higher in presidential elections than in midterm elections. (a) Identify two factors that have …
  3. essay

    I am writing an essay on a courageous United States elected official and cannot pick a subject to write about. The official must have been elected since 1956; presidents are not recommended subjects. Any ideas?
  4. U.S. presidential election

    There's 1 more question that I'd like to know relating to elections. What if Al Gore won the 2000 election instead of George W. Bush?
  5. history

    1. Free elections in Poland: A. were not very significant B. demonstrated clearly that the Cold War was ending. C. showed that Solidarity was not really all that influential and that people would not turn their back on Communist government. …
  6. US History

    PLEASE CHECK! && IF YOU HAVE ANY MORE INFO! What role did television play in the election of 1960?
  7. History

    In your own words answer each questions 150 words 1. Why are elections in the United States longer, more expensive, and more candidate-centered than in European democracies?
  8. United States Government

    The United States has this form of government. *representative democracy *monarchy *direct democracy *constitutional republic I think it may be D since a constitutional republic had a government with limited power where the people …
  9. Texas Government

    Unlike presidential primary elections, general presidential elections focus on the a. party loyalists. b. Electoral College. c. interest groups. d. campaign contributions. e. safe states. Is it going to be B or E ?
  10. Social Studies definition

    Presidential- legislative: An elected president leads the government, sharing power with a legislature and with the courts. ( the US is an example of a presidential-legislatie democracy) Question: Which best describes presidential-legislative?

More Similar Questions