effective persuasive writting

posted by .

how would you encourage a leluctant peer reviewer.

I would ask a question first

That's a good idea, but what kind of question(s) would you ask? Depending on what they are reviewing, there are many different questions that could be asked. Here are some possibilities.

What aspects seemed especially good about the paper?

Were there any parts that you had to reread to understand what I was saying? Were there any parts that you could not understand?

Were my arguments and evidence effective? Did I miss any potential points?

Would my paper be effective in convincing you? Why or why not?

I hope this helps. Thanks for asking.

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. peer review

    what are some advantages for both the reviewer and writer of peer reviews The author of a work that is reviewed by his/her peers gains prestige and legitimacy by having knowledgable people comment and review his work. The peers also …
  2. writing

    How would you encourage a reluctant peer reviewer?
  3. Help

    How would you encourage a reluctant peer reviewer?
  4. writing

    How would you encourage a reluctant peer reviewer?
  5. Peer review

    How would you encourage a reluctant peer reviewer?
  6. EFFECTIVE WRITING

    WHAT ARE SOME ADVANTAGES FOR BOTH REVIWER AND WRITER-OF PEER REVIEWS?
  7. COM 220

    what is the benefits of receiving a peer review?
  8. COM 220

    What benefit does the peer reviewer gain from this activity?
  9. effective writting

    What would be a good Thesis for. The benefit of completing high school.
  10. Socials

    Would abolishing child labour be an effective strategy to improve the lives of children?

More Similar Questions