8. The Tinker V. Des Moines case ruled that students have the right to make their opinions and voices heard in school, as long as it doesn't disrupt the learning of other students.

How does this ruling apply to you today?
Do you think that this ruling should also apply to what students post on social media during school hours? Why or why not?

As a student today, the Tinker v. Des Moines ruling applies to me in the sense that I still have the right to express my opinions and beliefs in school, as long as it does not disrupt the educational environment. This means that I am able to participate in peaceful protests, wear clothing with political messages, and engage in discussions about social issues without fear of censorship or punishment.

When it comes to social media use during school hours, I believe that the same principles should apply. Students should have the right to express themselves online, just as they would in person, as long as it does not interfere with their education or the learning of others. However, schools may have policies in place regarding social media use during school hours to ensure that it does not become a distraction or cause disruptions.

Overall, I believe that the Tinker v. Des Moines ruling should extend to social media use during school hours, as long as students are mindful of their responsibilities and do not abuse their freedom of expression. It is important for students to be able to share their thoughts and opinions both in person and online, as it is a crucial aspect of their right to free speech.

pls summarize, sorry. Thank you

In summary, the Tinker v. Des Moines ruling gives students the right to express their opinions in school as long as it does not disrupt the learning environment. This ruling should also apply to social media use during school hours, as long as students are responsible and respectful in their online expression. Students should have the freedom to share their thoughts and opinions both in person and online, as it is a fundamental aspect of their right to free speech.