discuss why following statement is too idealistic (i.e why it is not realistic or practical)
'' the mission of ethics officers in a company should be to work themselves out of a job''
The statement that the mission of ethics officers in a company should be to work themselves out of a job is too idealistic because it assumes that ethical issues within a company can be completely resolved and eliminated. In reality, ethical dilemmas are a natural and ongoing part of business operations, as they can arise from various factors such as changes in regulations, new technologies, and shifting societal values.
Ethics officers play a crucial role in identifying, addressing, and preventing ethical misconduct within an organization. Their responsibilities include developing and implementing ethical policies, providing ethics training, conducting investigations, and advising senior management on ethical decision-making. Due to the dynamic nature of business environments, it is unlikely that all ethical issues can be permanently eradicated, and therefore ethics officers will always be needed to navigate and resolve new challenges as they arise.
Furthermore, the idea of ethics officers working themselves out of a job overlooks the fact that compliance with ethical standards is an ongoing process that requires continuous monitoring, assessment, and improvement. Even if an organization reaches a point where ethical infractions are minimal, the importance of maintaining a strong ethical culture and preventing complacency means that ethics officers will still have a vital role to play in supporting the company's ethical values and objectives.
In conclusion, while the ultimate goal of ethics officers should be to foster a culture of integrity and transparency within a company, the notion that they should work themselves out of a job is unrealistic and impractical given the complex and evolving nature of ethical challenges in the business world.