In 3 sentences, compare the causes and effects of constitutional monarchy in England with the causes and effects of absolute monarchy in Russia.
The constitutional monarchy in England was formed as a result of the Glorious Revolution, which limited the power of the monarch and established a system of checks and balances on the government. This led to the development of a more democratic society with greater individual rights and representation for the people. In contrast, absolute monarchy in Russia was maintained through the rule of the Romanov dynasty, leading to a lack of political freedoms and widespread oppression among the population.
The causes of the constitutional monarchy in England were rooted in the desire to prevent absolute power from being concentrated in the hands of one individual, resulting in a more stable and equitable system of government. On the other hand, the absolute monarchy in Russia was perpetuated by a long history of autocratic rule, which stifled dissent and hindered progress towards greater political and social reform.
The effects of the constitutional monarchy in England included the establishment of a Parliament with the power to make laws and levy taxes, leading to a more accountable and transparent government. In contrast, the effects of absolute monarchy in Russia included economic stagnation, social unrest, and eventual revolution as the oppressive policies of the monarchy alienated the population and sparked widespread discontent.