Which of the following statements best compares the effects of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy?(1 point)
a. An absolute monarchy can last for centuries, while a constitutional monarchy only lasts for a set period of time, as outlined in the constitution.
b. An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability.
c. An absolute monarchy always leads to revolution, while a constitutional monarchy prevents revolution.
d. An absolute monarchy creates a system that cannot be controlled by other nobles, while a constitutional monarchy creates a system that subordinates the monarch to the elites.
b. An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability.
The best statement that compares the effects of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy is:
b. An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability.
To determine the correct answer, let's analyze each option and compare the effects of absolute monarchy and constitutional monarchy:
a. An absolute monarchy can last for centuries, while a constitutional monarchy only lasts for a set period of time, as outlined in the constitution.
This statement is incorrect. The longevity of a monarchy does not necessarily depend on whether it is absolute or constitutional. Historical examples show that both types of monarchies have lasted for long periods of time.
b. An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability.
This statement is closer to the truth. In an absolute monarchy, the power rests entirely with a single monarch, which can lead to instability if the monarch is corrupt or incompetent. In contrast, a constitutional monarchy allows for shared power between the monarch and other governing bodies, which can contribute to long-term stability.
c. An absolute monarchy always leads to revolution, while a constitutional monarchy prevents revolution.
This statement is too extreme and not accurate. History shows that both types of monarchies have experienced revolutions. Whether a monarchy leads to a revolution depends on various factors beyond its type of government.
d. An absolute monarchy creates a system that cannot be controlled by other nobles, while a constitutional monarchy creates a system that subordinates the monarch to the elites.
This statement oversimplifies the complexities of both types of monarchies. In an absolute monarchy, the monarch has absolute control and is not necessarily answerable to other nobles. In a constitutional monarchy, the monarch's powers are limited by a constitution, but the degree of control exercised by the elites can vary depending on the specific system.
Based on the analysis, option b. "An absolute monarchy is overly dependent on a single monarch, which can lead to a system that is overthrown, while a constitutional monarchy can bring long-term stability" is the most accurate statement. It recognizes the potential instability of an absolute monarchy and the potential for long-term stability in a constitutional monarchy.