In this discussion, you will discuss the idea of whether absolute monarchy was doomed to fail. Begin your discussion by addressing the following prompt: Was the concept of absolute monarchy doomed to fail? Use details from the unit to support and explain your reasoning. Post a detailed response to the discussion prompt. Then do the following: Respond to a classmate who answered that yes, the concept of absolute monarchy was doomed to fail. Respond to a classmate who answered that no, the concept of absolute monarchy was not doomed to fail.
I believe that the concept of absolute monarchy was indeed doomed to fail. Throughout history, we have seen numerous examples of absolute monarchies eventually collapsing due to various factors such as economic instability, lack of popular support, and internal power struggles.
One of the main reasons why absolute monarchies were doomed to fail is that they concentrated too much power in the hands of one individual, the monarch. This led to a lack of accountability and often resulted in decisions that were not in the best interest of the people. Additionally, absolute monarchs often relied on heavy taxation and forced labor to finance their lavish lifestyles and military campaigns, which inevitably led to social unrest and discontent among the population.
Furthermore, absolute monarchies were unsustainable in the long run because they stifled innovation and progress. Without the input and participation of a broader range of voices and perspectives, monarchs were limited in their ability to adapt to changing circumstances and address the needs of their societies.
Overall, absolute monarchies were doomed to fail because they were inherently flawed systems that concentrated too much power in the hands of one individual and stifled progress and innovation. History has shown us that societies thrive when power is distributed more equally among various institutions and individuals, rather than being concentrated in the hands of a single monarch.
Response to classmate who answered "yes":
I agree with your point that absolute monarchy was doomed to fail due to the concentration of power in the hands of one individual. By not having checks and balances in place, monarchs were able to make unilateral decisions that often led to discontent and instability within their societies. Additionally, without accountability to the people, monarchs were more likely to make decisions that benefitted themselves rather than the well-being of their citizens.
Response to classmate who answered "no":
While I see your perspective that absolute monarchy was not necessarily doomed to fail, I believe that history has shown us otherwise. The examples of absolute monarchies that have collapsed throughout history due to internal and external pressures suggest that this form of government was inherently flawed and unsustainable in the long run. By concentrating too much power in the hands of one individual, absolute monarchies were bound to eventual failure.