In this discussion, you will discuss the idea of whether absolute monarchy was doomed to fail.


Begin your discussion by addressing the following prompt:

Was the concept of absolute monarchy doomed to fail? Use details from the unit to support and explain your reasoning.

Post a detailed response to the discussion prompt. Then do the following:
Respond to a classmate who answered that yes, the concept of absolute monarchy was doomed to fail.
Respond to a classmate who answered that no, the concept of absolute monarchy was not doomed to fail.

I believe that the concept of absolute monarchy was indeed doomed to fail. Absolute monarchy gave unchecked power to a single monarch, allowing them to make decisions without any restraint or accountability. This concentration of power in the hands of one individual often led to abuses of power, corruption, and constant unrest among the population.

Throughout history, we have seen numerous examples of absolute monarchs who became tyrannical and oppressive rulers. For instance, King Louis XIV of France, known as the "Sun King," centralized power in himself, leading to widespread inequality, economic hardships, and social unrest among the French population. Additionally, monarchs like Tsar Nicholas II of Russia and King Charles I of England faced rebellions and revolutions due to their autocratic rule, ultimately leading to the downfall of their monarchies.

Furthermore, the rise of Enlightenment ideas and the Age of Reason challenged the legitimacy of absolute monarchy. Philosophers such as John Locke and Baron de Montesquieu advocated for the separation of powers and a system of checks and balances to prevent any form of absolute power. These ideas inspired revolutions like the American and French Revolutions, which sought to abolish absolute monarchy in favor of more democratic forms of government.

In conclusion, the concept of absolute monarchy was inherently flawed and destined to fail due to the unchecked power it granted to a single ruler. History has shown us that absolute monarchies often descend into tyranny and oppression, leading to revolutions and the eventual downfall of the monarchy. It is clear that absolutism is not a sustainable form of government in the long run.

a little shorter pls

I agree that the concept of absolute monarchy was doomed to fail. Giving one individual unchecked power often led to abuses, corruption, and unrest among the population. History has shown that absolute monarchies, such as those of Louis XIV, Tsar Nicholas II, and King Charles I, ultimately faced rebellions and revolutions due to their autocratic rule. Additionally, Enlightenment ideas challenged the legitimacy of absolute monarchy, advocating for checks and balances to prevent tyranny. Therefore, it is clear that the concept of absolute monarchy was unsustainable in the long run.

now make it look like a 7th grader

I think absolute monarchy was doomed to fail because it gave one person too much power. When kings had all the power, they could do whatever they wanted without anyone stopping them. This often led to them being mean and unfair to their people. We can see this in history with kings like Louis XIV and Tsar Nicholas II, who faced rebellions because of how they treated their people. People started to think that everyone should have a say in how the government is run, not just one person. So, in the end, absolute monarchy just didn't work out because it caused too many problems.