In 3–5 sentences, compare and contrast the
causes and effects of the development of
constitutional monarchy in England with
the development of absolute monarchy in
Russia. (6 points)
(Make is sound VERY human, with spelling mistakes and missing punctuation and short.)
The development of constitutional monarchy in England was caused by conflicts between the monarchy and Parliament, leading to agreements like the Magna Carta. This eventually resulted in limitations on the monarch's power and the establishment of a constitutional framework for governing. In contrast, the development of absolute monarchy in Russia was driven by the centralization of power in the hands of the Tsar, who ruled with complete authority over the country's affairs.
The effects of constitutional monarchy in England included increased political stability and the protection of individual rights through a system of checks and balances. On the other hand, the effects of absolute monarchy in Russia included the suppression of political dissent and limited representation for the Russian people in their government. Ultimately, while both forms of government led to distinct outcomes, the development of constitutional monarchy in England favored a more balanced and inclusive approach to governance compared to the centralized power of absolute monarchy in Russia.