in 4 sentences Compare the causes and affects a constitutional monarchy in England with the causes and effects of the absolute monarchy in Russia
A constitutional monarchy in England developed due to a long history of conflict between the monarchy and the people, resulting in the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215. This document limited the power of the monarch and established the principle of rule of law. The effects of this system included a more stable political system, increased protection of individual rights and liberties, and a gradual shift towards a more democratic society.
On the other hand, absolute monarchy in Russia originated from a different set of circumstances. The Russian czars had absolute power over the state and its people, with no checks or limitations on their authority. This resulted in rampant corruption, widespread poverty among the population, and a lack of political representation. The effects of this system included social unrest, increased disparity between the ruling class and the masses, and a resistance towards modernization and societal progress.
Overall, while a constitutional monarchy in England led to a more equitable and balanced society, with a strong foundation of democratic values, absolute monarchy in Russia hindered societal development and perpetuated inequality and stagnation. The contrasting causes and effects of these two systems highlight the significance of political structures and their impact on the well-being of nations.