In 3-5 sentences, compare and contrast the causes and effects of the development of constitutional monarchy in England with the development of absolute monarchy in Russia.
The development of constitutional monarchy in England was largely driven by a struggle for power between the monarchy and nobility. The Magna Carta in 1215 marked the first step towards limiting the king's power and establishing a system where the monarch ruled with the consent of the governed. This led to the Glorious Revolution in 1688, resulting in the establishment of a constitutional monarchy with a limited monarchy and a constitutional framework.
In contrast, the development of absolute monarchy in Russia was driven by a desire for centralized power and the consolidation of authority in the hands of the ruling monarchs. The reign of Ivan the Terrible in the 16th century marked a shift towards absolute monarchism, and it continued with later rulers such as Peter the Great and Catherine the Great. The effects of absolute monarchy in Russia included centralization of power, suppression of dissent, and the imposition of serfdom on the majority of the population.
Overall, while the development of constitutional monarchy in England was characterized by a struggle for power and the establishment of checks on monarchical authority, the development of absolute monarchy in Russia was marked by the consolidation of power in the hands of the ruling monarchs, leading to centralization and suppression of dissent.