in 9th grade In 3
sentences, compare the causes and effects of constitutional monarchy in England with the causes and effects of absolute monarchy in Russia.
The causes of the constitutional monarchy in England were primarily rooted in the Glorious Revolution of 1688, where parliamentarians sought to limit the powers of the monarch and establish a more balanced government. This resulted in the adoption of the Bill of Rights in 1689, which granted certain rights and powers to parliament and restricted the monarch's authority. The effects of constitutional monarchy in England included greater political stability, the establishment of a constitutional framework, and the gradual expansion of democratic principles over time.
In contrast, the causes of absolute monarchy in Russia can be traced back to the reign of Peter the Great in the late 17th and early 18th centuries. Peter centralized power in the monarchy and implemented policies to modernize and westernize Russia. This consolidation of power led to the establishment of an absolute monarchy, where the tsar had complete control over the government and society. The effects of absolute monarchy in Russia included the suppression of political dissent, limited personal freedoms, and societal inequality under the autocratic rule.
Overall, while constitutional monarchy in England was a result of a gradual shift towards a more balanced government and the recognition of individual rights, absolute monarchy in Russia emerged from a consolidation of power by the monarch, resulting in a more authoritarian and centralized rule. The effects of constitutional monarchy in England were more conducive to political stability and the growth of democratic principles, while the effects of absolute monarchy in Russia were characterized by suppression of liberties and inequality.