Which evidence best supports the historical claim that the East-West Schism did not begin in 1054 CE but that the mutual excommunication was part of an already growing division? (1 point) The decreasing power of the pope following the end of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE conflicted with the rise of Byzantine power in the East The Roman Catholic Church affirmed the idea of papal supremacy at the First Vatican Council in 1870 CE The Byzantine Empire rose as a major economic and political power in the western Mediterranean region while Western Europe became more isolated . Crusaders from Western Europe looted and sacked the city of Constantinople in 1204 CE
The best evidence that supports the historical claim that the East-West Schism did not begin in 1054 CE but that the mutual excommunication was part of an already growing division is: The Crusaders from Western Europe looted and sacked the city of Constantinople in 1204 CE. This event demonstrates the increasing hostility and division between the Eastern and Western churches, as the Crusaders were supposed to be allies of the Byzantine Empire but instead attacked and looted their capital city. This event indicates that the division between the East and West was already growing and had reached a point where violence and aggression was being carried out.
A b c or d
d. Crusaders from Western Europe looted and sacked the city of Constantinople in 1204 CE.
