roosevelt:from citizenship in a republic. The good citizen in a republic must realize that he possess two sets of qualities, and that neither without the other he must have those qualities to which make for efficiency, and he must have those qualities which direct the efficiency into the channels for the public, but if a man's efficiency is not guided and regulated by a moral sense then the more efficient he is the worst he is, the more dangerous to the body politic, courage intellect all of the more masterful qualities serve but to make a man more evil if they are merely for that man's own advancement, with brutal indifference to the right of others
Eisenhower:From remarks at the United Negro College fund luncheon another thing I have preached as many others is against the theory that they can be any second-class citizen I believe as long as we allow conditions to exist that make for second-class citizens, we are making ourselves less than first class citizens words I believe that the only way to protect my own rights is to protect the rights of others everything that the constitution accord to me I must defend for others or else there will be nobody left to defend me
Which statement best describes a difference, and how Roosevelt and Eisenhower argue for supporting the rights of all citizens
Answers
Claims that ignoring everyone's rights to create risk, Eisenhower claims that ignoring everyone's rights results from a flaw theory
Roosevelt claims that the efficiency is way to protect everyone's rights. Eisenhower claims that fairness is a way to protect everyone's rights.
Roosevelt claims that the community must everyone's right sacred Eisenhower claims that the government must defend everyone's rights
Roosevelt claims failing Eisenhower claims that failing to support everyone's rights threatens all all rights