Roman Republic Quick Check
Which statement best explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic? (1 point)
The consuls of the Roman Republic dictated the agenda of the Tribal Assembly whereas the Athenian democracy was decided by the Council of
500
• The Athenian polis was ruled by a monarch whereas the Roman Republic used two consuls
The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens
• The Athenian Council of 500 was responsible for military decisions whereas the Roman Republic did not have a specific body designated for military actions.
The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens
which statment best explains the diffrences between the democracy of the athenian polis and the structure of the romen republic
The statement that best explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic is:
The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens.
To determine the statement that best explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic, we need to analyze each option:
1. The statement "The consuls of the Roman Republic dictated the agenda of the Tribal Assembly whereas the Athenian democracy was decided by the Council of 500" does not accurately represent the differences between the two systems. While consuls did hold power in the Roman Republic, it was not related to the Tribal Assembly, which was an Athenian institution.
2. The statement "The Athenian polis was ruled by a monarch whereas the Roman Republic used two consuls" correctly highlights a key difference. The Athenian polis did not have a monarch, whereas the Roman Republic had two consuls who shared executive power.
3. The statement "The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens" accurately distinguishes the composition of these political bodies. The Roman Senate was comprised of wealthy patricians, while the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 included citizens from different territories decided by lot.
4. The statement "The Athenian Council of 500 was responsible for military decisions whereas the Roman Republic did not have a specific body designated for military actions" is not an accurate representation of the respective roles of these institutions. The Athenian Council of 500 did play a role in military matters, but the Roman Republic did establish a specific body, the Senate, which had authority over military affairs.
Based on the analysis above, option 2, "The Athenian polis was ruled by a monarch whereas the Roman Republic used two consuls," is the statement that best explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic.