How did the US Supreme Court interpret this article in Givvons v. odgen 1824? Select two
States may be subject to federal regulation in matters of commerce
The Supreme Court interpreted the article in Givvons v. Ogden 1824 by:
1. Affirming the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce: The Court held that the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution grants Congress the authority to regulate commerce between states, including navigation and trade. This interpretation allowed for federal regulation in matters of commerce and limited the power of individual states in this regard.
2. Invalidating state laws that obstructed interstate commerce: The Court ruled that a New York state law granting a monopoly to a steamship company was unconstitutional because it obstructed the free flow of commerce between states. This decision further established the supremacy of federal law in matters of interstate commerce over conflicting state laws.