How did the U.S. Supreme Court interpret this article in Givvons v. Ogden (1824)? Select TWO correct answers.
States may possess the power to regulate interstate commerce.
States may regulate commerce within their own borders.
States may be subject to federal regulation in matters of commerce.
States may pass legislation that restricts interstate commerce
States may control commerce within their borders that involves foreign countries.
States may regulate commerce within their own borders and states may be subject to federal regulation in matters of commerce.
Washington longed to retire to his fields at Mount Vernon. But he soon realized that the Nation under its Articles of Confederation was not functioning well, so he became a prime mover in the steps leading to the Constitutional Convention at Philadelphia in 1787. When the new Constitution was ratified, the Electoral College unanimously elected Washington President. He did not infringe upon the policy making powers that he felt the Constitution gave Congress. But the determination of foreign policy became preponderantly a Presidential concern. When the French Revolution led to a major war between France and England, Washington refused to accept entirely the recommendations of either his Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson, who was pro-French, or his Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton, who was pro-British. Rather, he insisted upon a neutral course until the United States could grow stronger. —WhiteHouse.gov
Based on evidence from your text, why did Washington reject the advice of both Jefferson and Hamilton and adopt a policy of neutrality?
Washington feared that war would divide the nation.
Washington was upset over the murder of the French king.
The nation could not afford another war so soon after the Revolution.
Washington was timid about taking military action.