What different impacts did Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto have on Europe than it had on other parts of the world?(1 point) Responses China decided that a slow communist revolution with piecemeal legislation was key, rather than opting for an authoritarian government. China decided that a slow communist revolution with piecemeal legislation was key, rather than opting for an authoritarian government. Russian citizens decided they did not identify with the class warfare mentioned by Karl Marx. Russian citizens decided they did not identify with the class warfare mentioned by Karl Marx. The “bourgeoisie” was interpreted to be the Western imperializing nations, such as England and the U.S. The “bourgeoisie” was interpreted to be the Western imperializing nations, such as England and the U.S. The Egyptians wanted to establish their own bourgeoisie and built the Suez Canal.
It is difficult to attribute specific impacts of Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto on different regions with certainty. However, based on the provided responses, it can be inferred that the impacts varied:
1. China: The response suggests that China adopted a strategy of gradual communist revolution rather than pursuing an authoritarian government. This could imply that the Communist Manifesto influenced Chinese leaders to focus on implementing communist ideals through legislative changes rather than a sudden overthrow of the existing system.
2. Russia: The response states that Russian citizens did not identify with the class warfare mentioned by Marx. This could indicate that the ideas presented in the Communist Manifesto did not resonate with the Russian population, or that they had a different interpretation of class struggle within their own context.
3. Western Imperializing Nations: The response suggests that the concept of the "bourgeoisie" mentioned in the Manifesto was interpreted as referring to Western imperializing nations like England and the U.S. This indicates that these nations may have been seen as the embodiment of the capitalist class that Marx criticized in his work.
4. Egypt: The response suggests that the Egyptians sought to establish their own bourgeoisie and constructed the Suez Canal. This implies that they may have interpreted the Manifesto as advocating for the development of a distinct local bourgeoisie to challenge existing power structures.
In summary, the impacts of the Communist Manifesto varied in different regions, leading to different interpretations and responses based on the specific social, political, and economic contexts of each place.
just one should be correct
Apologies for the confusion. Based on the responses provided, it can be inferred that the correct impact of Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto on different parts of the world is:
3. Western Imperializing Nations: The "bourgeoisie" was interpreted to be the Western imperializing nations, such as England and the U.S. This suggests that these nations were seen as embodying the capitalist class criticized by Marx in his work.