What different impacts did Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto have on Europe than it had on other parts of the world?(1 point) Responses
China decided that a slow communist revolution with piecemeal legislation was key, rather than opting for an authoritarian government.
Russian citizens decided they did not identify with the class warfare mentioned by Karl Marx.
The “bourgeoisie” was interpreted to be the Western imperializing nations, such as England and the U.S.
The Egyptians wanted to establish their own bourgeoisie and built the Suez Canal.
It seems some of the responses provided are not accurate interpretations of the impact of Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto in different parts of the world.
In Europe, Marx's Communist Manifesto had a significant impact on the development of socialist and communist movements, leading to the rise of various communist parties and labor unions advocating for workers' rights and socialism. It also influenced political thought and policies in many European countries, leading to the establishment of socialist and social-democratic governments in some cases.
In other parts of the world, such as China and Russia, the impact of the Communist Manifesto was significant but different. In China, the Communist Manifesto influenced the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese revolution, leading to the establishment of a communist government in 1949. In Russia, the Communist Manifesto was instrumental in the rise of the Bolshevik Party and the Russian Revolution of 1917, which led to the establishment of the Soviet Union.
Overall, the impact of Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto was significant in Europe and other parts of the world, but the specific effects and outcomes varied depending on the historical, political, and social contexts of each region.