Guo Ju was the older brother of Ge. As the older brother, Ju was the rightful heir of his family's farm and any money the family had when the parents died. Ge, worried about his future, and jealous of Ju, attacked his brother in the middle of the night, taking Ju's life. Ge was the only son left and clearly the rightful heir to the family fortune.
Filial piety yes or no And why
Filial piety refers to the Confucian virtue of respect and obedience to one's parents and ancestors. In this scenario, Ge's actions of attacking and killing his older brother, Ju, do not align with the values of filial piety.
In Confucianism, the older sibling holds a higher social position and is traditionally the rightful heir to the family's assets and responsibilities. Guo Ju being the older brother would naturally inherit the family estate and fortunes. Ge's decision to murder his brother out of jealousy and worry about his own future is not only a violation of filial piety but also a violation of moral and ethical principles.
Filial piety expects individuals to respect and honor their family members and act in ways that contribute to family harmony and social order. Ge's actions go against these values and reflect a lack of filial piety.
It is important to note that filial piety also encompasses the duty to care for and support one's parents, even after their death. Ge's act of killing his brother not only violates the principle of respecting elders but also fails to fulfill his obligations towards his deceased parents.
Overall, Ge's actions in the given scenario do not align with the concept of filial piety due to his disregard for family harmony, respect for elders, and moral responsibilities.