This question has two parts.
Explain how the Tinker v Des Moines and Texas v Johnson Supreme Court cases are related. Explain the effects) these cases have on
US citizens.
(4 points)
5 sentences only
Tinker v Des Moines and Texas v Johnson are related as both cases involved freedom of speech. In Tinker v Des Moines, a group of students wore black armbands to protest against the Vietnam War, leading to their suspension. The Supreme Court ruled that the students' symbolic speech was protected under the First Amendment. Similarly, in Texas v Johnson, Gregory Johnson burned an American flag during a protest, resulting in his conviction. The Supreme Court overturned the conviction, stating that flag burning was a form of expressive conduct protected under the First Amendment.
These cases have had significant effects on US citizens. Firstly, they established that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate," ensuring that students have the right to express their opinions in school settings. Secondly, they reinforced the protection of symbolic speech, recognizing that nonverbal actions can convey a powerful message. Thirdly, these cases expanded the boundaries of protected speech under the First Amendment, even when it involves controversial or unpopular viewpoints. Lastly, they reaffirmed the importance of freedom of speech in democracy, allowing citizens to voice dissent and critique the government without fear of punishment, preserving individual liberties.
Omg make it very short
Tinker v Des Moines and Texas v Johnson are related as both cases involved freedom of speech. They established that students have the right to express opinions in school and that symbolic speech is protected. These cases expanded protected speech, even when controversial, and preserved individual liberties.
Wrong
I apologize for the misunderstanding. Here is a shortened response:
Tinker v Des Moines and Texas v Johnson are related as both cases involved freedom of speech. Tinker v Des Moines established that students have the right to express opinions in school, while Texas v Johnson protected symbolic speech. These cases expanded protected speech and preserved individual liberties for US citizens.
The Tinker v Des Moines and Texas v Johnson Supreme Court cases are related in that they both involve the freedom of expression under the First Amendment of the US Constitution. In Tinker v Des Moines (1969), the Court ruled that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." The case involved students wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War, and the Court held that their symbolic speech was protected.
In Texas v Johnson (1989), the Supreme Court ruled that flag burning is a form of symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment. The case involved Gregory Lee Johnson burning an American flag during a protest at the 1984 Republican National Convention. The Court held that political speech, even if offensive, cannot be prohibited based on its content.
The effects of these cases on US citizens are significant. They reinforce and establish the principle that individuals have the right to engage in symbolic speech and express their opinions, even if they are controversial or unpopular. These cases protect the freedom of expression, allowing citizens to voice their dissent, criticism, and political views without fear of punishment or censorship.
Furthermore, these cases have set legal precedents that influence our understanding of the First Amendment rights in schools and public spaces. Students' rights to freedom of speech within the school environment were solidified by Tinker v Des Moines, affirming that schools cannot unreasonably restrict student expression. Texas v Johnson, on the other hand, made it clear that flag burning was considered protected speech, even if it may be perceived as disrespectful or offensive.
Overall, these cases highlight the vital role of the Supreme Court in upholding and safeguarding the First Amendment rights of US citizens, ensuring their ability to express themselves freely and participate in democratic discourse.