In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines, how did the Justices

defend the armbands students wore in public school?
(1 point)

The armbands looked similar to the students’ uniforms.

The armbands were only worn by students for 30
minutes a day.

The armbands were small enough that no one could see
them.

The armbands did not interfere with other students’
learning.

The armbands did not interfere with other students’ learning.

In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines, the Justices defended the armbands students wore in public school by stating that the armbands did not interfere with other students' learning.

To get to this answer, you would need to research the Tinker v. Des Moines case and specifically look for information on how the Justices defended the armbands. You could start by searching for "Tinker v. Des Moines case" and reading about the details of the case, the arguments made by the parties involved, and the opinions of the Justices. This would provide you with the necessary information to understand why the Justices defended the armbands by emphasizing that they did not interfere with other students' learning.

The Justices defended the armbands students wore in public school by stating that the armbands did not interfere with other students' learning.