In 3–5 sentences, compare the causes and effects of
constitutional monarchy in England with the causes
and effects of absolute monarchy in Russia.
(4 points)
The causes of constitutional monarchy in England were mainly political and religious. The English Civil War and Glorious Revolution led to the establishment of a constitutional monarchy as a way to limit the power of the monarch and protect the rights of the people. The effects of this were the development of a parliamentary system and the gradual shift towards a democratic government.
In contrast, the causes of absolute monarchy in Russia were rooted in a desire for stability and centralization of power. The effects of absolute monarchy in Russia were the concentration of power in the hands of the Tsar, limited political freedoms, and an oppressive regime that led to discontent and eventual revolution.
The causes of constitutional monarchy in England were rooted in the desire to limit the power of the monarchy and establish a system of checks and balances. This was largely driven by the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution, which led to the adoption of the Bill of Rights in 1689. The effects of the constitutional monarchy in England included the establishment of a system where the monarch's powers were limited by law and the development of representative government.
In contrast, the causes of absolute monarchy in Russia were driven by the ambition of the Tsars to consolidate their power and control over the vast empire. Russia's political culture and history also played a role in the rise of absolute monarchy. The effects of absolute monarchy in Russia included the concentration of power in the hands of the Tsars, the suppression of dissent, and the limited rights and freedoms of the Russian people.
Overall, while the constitutional monarchy in England aimed to limit the power of the monarchy and establish a system of governance based on laws, the absolute monarchy in Russia sought to consolidate and centralize power under the Tsar, resulting in a more authoritarian and oppressive system.
To compare the causes and effects of constitutional monarchy in England with the causes and effects of absolute monarchy in Russia, you will need to examine the historical context and characteristics of each system. Start by researching the circumstances that led to the establishment of constitutional monarchy in England, such as the Glorious Revolution of 1688, which limited the power of the monarchy through the signing of the English Bill of Rights. In contrast, investigate the factors that led to the rise of absolute monarchy in Russia, such as the reign of Peter the Great and the subsequent consolidation of power by Catherine the Great. Consider the impacts of these systems on society, governance, and individual rights, such as the role of parliament, rule of law, and limitations on the monarch's power in England, versus the concentrated authority and lack of checks and balances under absolute monarchy in Russia.
could you make it more simple and less
Certainly! Here's a simpler version:
The causes of constitutional monarchy in England were driven by a desire to limit the power of the monarchy and establish a system with checks and balances. This was influenced by events like the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution. The effects of constitutional monarchy in England included the development of a parliamentary system and greater protection of individual rights.
On the other hand, the causes of absolute monarchy in Russia were motivated by the ambition of the Tsars to consolidate power and control over the empire. The effects of absolute monarchy in Russia were the concentration of power in the hands of the Tsars, limited political freedoms, and a lack of checks and balances.
In summary, constitutional monarchy in England aimed to limit the power of the monarchy and establish a system of governance based on laws, while absolute monarchy in Russia resulted in the concentration of power under the Tsars and limited political freedoms.