In the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, how did the process of judicial review allow the Supreme Court to decide on the case? (1 point)
• The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional.
• The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, stating that the rule of law protected individuals from segregation in schools.
• The ruling was found in favor of the defendant, stating that in education they are allowed to segregate.
• The ruling was found in favor of the defendant, citing the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional.
The correct answer is:
• The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional.
In the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, the process of judicial review allowed the Supreme Court to decide on the case by ruling in favor of the plaintiff. The Court determined that the policy of "separate but equal" in schools was unconstitutional, as it violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This landmark decision declared that segregation in public schools was inherently unequal and paved the way for desegregation efforts across the United States.
In the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, the process of judicial review allowed the Supreme Court to decide on the case by reaching a ruling in favor of the plaintiff. The correct answer is:
• The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional.
Now, let me explain how judicial review works in this context. Judicial review is the power of the courts to determine the constitutionality of laws or government actions. In the United States, it is the responsibility of the Supreme Court to exercise judicial review.
In the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, the Supreme Court reviewed the issue of racial segregation in public schools. The court's decision ultimately declared that the concept of "separate but equal" violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
To arrive at this ruling, the Supreme Court examined the arguments presented by both parties, considered the relevant constitutional principles, and evaluated the facts of the case. They reviewed previous precedent, legal principles, and societal implications to make an informed judgment.
In this case, the Court determined that racial segregation in public schools perpetuated inequality, even if the facilities provided were technically equal. This landmark ruling had a significant impact on desegregating schools across the United States and advancing civil rights.
In summary, judicial review allowed the Supreme Court to decide on the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, ultimately ruling in favor of the plaintiff and declaring that separate but equal is unconstitutional.