Read the following excerpt from Brown v. Board of
Education of Topeka:
a “We conclude that in the field of public education the
doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place. Separate
educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we
hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for
whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the
segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection
of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment . . .
..”
b Describe the political strategy used to eliminate
discrepancies between Black Americans and American
ideals through this court case.
c Congress wrote and passed laws addressing unfairness.
Interest groups litigated unfair laws in the Supreme
Court.
d Interest groups create political alliances with parties.
Social movements demonstrated in large groups.
c Congress wrote and passed laws addressing unfairness. Interest groups litigated unfair laws in the Supreme Court.
The correct answer is: b Describe the political strategy used to eliminate discrepancies between Black Americans and American ideals through this court case.
In Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, the political strategy used to eliminate discrepancies between Black Americans and American ideals was through a court case. The plaintiffs, who were Black Americans and others in similar situations, alleged that they were deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment due to the segregation of public educational facilities. By bringing this case to the Supreme Court, they aimed to challenge the doctrine of "separate but equal" and argue that separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. The court ultimately agreed with the plaintiffs, concluding that segregation in public education is unconstitutional.
Therefore, the political strategy used in this case was to utilize the legal system and the courts to challenge the discriminatory practices and seek a ruling that would eliminate the disparities between Black Americans and American ideals of equality and equal protection under the law.
c Congress wrote and passed laws addressing unfairness. Interest groups litigated unfair laws in the Supreme Court.
The political strategy used to eliminate discrepancies between Black Americans and American ideals in the Brown v. Board of Education case involved a combination of legislative action and litigation by interest groups.
Congress played a role by writing and passing laws that aimed to address unfairness, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. These laws were intended to uphold the equal protection guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
In addition to legislative action, interest groups also played a crucial role in litigating unfair laws in the Supreme Court. The NAACP's Legal Defense and Education Fund, led by Thurgood Marshall, played a significant role in bringing the Brown v. Board of Education case to the Supreme Court. They argued that the "separate but equal" doctrine in public education was inherently unequal and violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
Through this combined political strategy of legislative action and litigation, the goal was to challenge and eliminate discriminatory laws and practices, and ensure equality and protection for Black Americans under the law.