What was the constitutional basis for overturning the Virginia statute in Loving v. Virginia?(1 point) Responses The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone who makes less than $30,000 is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone who makes less than $30,000 is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another state is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another state is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone who is more than ten years older than you is protected under the equal protection clause.

The constitutional basis for overturning the Virginia statute in Loving v. Virginia was the Supreme Court's finding that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause.

The correct answer is: The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause.

The constitutional basis for overturning the Virginia statute in Loving v. Virginia was that the Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause.

To arrive at this conclusion, one must understand the context of the case and the legal reasoning employed by the Supreme Court. Loving v. Virginia was a landmark case decided in 1967, where the Supreme Court struck down laws banning interracial marriage.

To get the answer to this question, one can follow these steps:
1. Research the case: Look up the background and details of the Loving v. Virginia case. Understand the parties involved, the issues at stake, and the legal arguments presented.
2. Examine the constitutional basis: In this case, the central question was whether Virginia's interracial marriage ban violated the Constitution's equal protection clause. The equal protection clause, found in the Fourteenth Amendment, states that no state shall deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
3. Analyze the Supreme Court ruling: Read the Supreme Court's opinion in the Loving v. Virginia case. The Court held that the Virginia statute violated the equal protection clause because it discriminated against individuals based on their race. They concluded that the freedom to marry was a fundamental right protected under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and that Virginia's ban on interracial marriage singled out a racial group for disfavored treatment.
4. Identify the specific constitutional basis: From the analysis of the Supreme Court ruling, one can determine that the constitutional basis for overturning the Virginia statute in Loving v. Virginia was the equal protection clause.

In summary, to answer the question about the constitutional basis for overturning the Virginia statute in Loving v. Virginia, one needs to research the case, examine the constitutional basis, analyze the Supreme Court ruling, and identify that the equal protection clause was the specific constitutional basis relied upon by the Court.