What was the constitutional basis for overturning the Virginia statute in Loving v. Virginia?(1 point) Responses The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone who makes less than $30,000 is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone who makes less than $30,000 is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another state is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another state is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone who is more than ten years older than you is protected under the equal protection clause.

Question

What was the constitutional basis for overturning the Virginia statute in Loving v. Virginia?(1 point) Responses The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone who makes less than $30,000 is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone who makes less than $30,000 is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another state is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another state is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause. The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone who is more than ten years older than you is protected under the equal protection clause.

Answer 1

The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause.

Answer 2

The correct answer is: "The Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause."

To understand why the Supreme Court reached this conclusion, we need to examine the legal basis for their decision, which can be found in the opinion issued by the Court in Loving v. Virginia. In this case, the Court was faced with the question of whether Virginia's statute criminalizing interracial marriage violated the Constitution.

The Court held that the Virginia statute violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment states that no state shall deny any person within its jurisdiction equal protection of the laws. This essentially means that individuals must be treated equally under the law, without discrimination based on race.

Applying this principle to the case at hand, the Court found that laws prohibiting interracial marriage were a form of racial discrimination. They held that the freedom to marry is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of an individual, and that the Equal Protection Clause prohibits states from interfering with this essential liberty.

Therefore, the constitutional basis for overturning the Virginia statute in Loving v. Virginia was the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which protects the right to marry someone from another race.

Answer 3

The constitutional basis for overturning the Virginia statute in Loving v. Virginia was that the Supreme Court found that the ability to marry someone from another race is protected under the equal protection clause.