Amir is trying yo determine the authors purpose as he reads th article the great molasses flood for history clas he notices that the adjectives shoddy and unsafe that areus3d to describe the tank that held the molasses have a negative feeling associated wit them
Amir is trying to determine the author's purpose as he reads the article "The Great Molasses Flood" for history class. He notices that the adjectives "shoddy" and "unsafe" used to describe the tank that held the molasses have a negative feeling associated with them.
To determine the author's purpose in using the adjectives "shoddy" and "unsafe" to describe the tank that held the molasses in the article "The Great Molasses Flood," we can follow these steps:
1. Identify the adjectives: The adjectives mentioned in the question are "shoddy" and "unsafe."
2. Analyze the meaning of the adjectives: "Shoddy" typically suggests poor quality or workmanship, while "unsafe" indicates a lack of safety or security.
3. Identify the noun being described: The adjectives describe the tank that held the molasses.
4. Consider the context: In this article, the adjectives are used to describe the tank that eventually caused the molasses flood. Given that a flood of molasses is a disaster, the author's purpose in using negative adjectives is to emphasize and highlight the poor condition and inadequate safety measures of the tank.
5. Determine the author's purpose: From the negative connotations associated with "shoddy" and "unsafe," it can be inferred that the author's purpose is to criticize the negligence or incompetence of those responsible for the tank's construction or maintenance. The author may also aim to create a sense of anger, shock, or concern among readers about the events that transpired due to this negligence.
In summary, the author's use of the adjectives "shoddy" and "unsafe" to describe the molasses tank in the article "The Great Molasses Flood" serves to emphasize the poor quality and lack of safety associated with the tank, which allows the author to critique the responsible parties and evoke strong emotions from the readers.
To determine the author's purpose in using specific adjectives like "shoddy" and "unsafe" to describe the tank that held the molasses in the article "The Great Molasses Flood," Amir can follow a few steps:
1. Read the entire article: Before analyzing the author's purpose, it is essential to have a thorough understanding of the entire article. By reading the entire piece, Amir can gather more context about the topic, events, and overall tone.
2. Identify the tone and atmosphere: Adjectives like "shoddy" and "unsafe" have a negative connotation, suggesting an unfavorable tone towards the tank's construction. Amir should pay attention to other descriptive words or phrases used throughout the article to gauge the overall feelings and emotions conveyed.
3. Analyze the author's intent: Amir can consider why the author chose to describe the tank in such terms. The negative adjectives might imply that the author intends to highlight the poor construction and potential dangers associated with the tank. This could serve the purpose of emphasizing negligence or incompetence on the part of those responsible for the tank's design and maintenance.
4. Look for supporting evidence: Amir can search for other instances within the article where the author criticizes or points out flaws regarding the tank or its implications. This evidence can further support the idea that the author's purpose is to convey a negative assessment of the tank's quality and safety.
5. Consider the broader context: Understanding the historical context of the article, such as the time period, societal attitudes, or previous incidents related to industrial safety, can also aid in determining the author's purpose. It can provide insights into why the author might emphasize the negative aspects of the tank.
By following these steps, Amir can analyze the author's purpose behind using the adjectives "shoddy" and "unsafe" to describe the tank holding molasses in the article.