In the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, how did the process of judicial review allow the Supreme Court to decide on the case?(1 point) Responses The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, stating that the rule of law protected individuals from segregation in schools. The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, stating that the rule of law protected individuals from segregation in schools. The ruling was found in favor of the defendant, stating that in education they are allowed to segregate. The ruling was found in favor of the defendant, stating that in education they are allowed to segregate. The ruling was found in favor of the defendant, citing the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The ruling was found in favor of the defendant, citing the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional.
The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional.
The ruling in the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional. The process of judicial review allowed the Supreme Court to decide on the case by reviewing the constitutionality of the "separate but equal" doctrine, which allowed racial segregation in public schools. The Court determined that segregation based on race violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees equal protection under the law. This decision helped to end legal segregation in public schools and played a significant role in the civil rights movement.
In the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, the process of judicial review allowed the Supreme Court to decide on the case by reviewing the constitutionality of the segregation of public schools based on race. Judicial review is the power of the courts to review and invalidate laws or government actions that are found to be inconsistent with the Constitution.
To determine whether the segregation of public schools was constitutional, the Supreme Court assessed the case in light of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees that no state shall deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This clause is a key component of the Constitution that ensures individuals are treated equally under the law.
In the ruling of the case, the Supreme Court found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that the doctrine of "separate but equal," which allowed for racial segregation, was unconstitutional in the context of public education. The Court concluded that separate educational facilities for black and white students were inherently unequal and violated the principle of equal protection.
Therefore, the correct statement is: The ruling was found in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that separate but equal is unconstitutional.