The statement, "Assuming that if it is rational for one person to stand at a football game to get a better view then it is rational for everyone to stand at a football game to get a better view" is an example of:
economic reasoning.
the fallacy of division.
the fallacy of composition.
the ceteris paribus assumption
The statement, "Assuming that if it is rational for one person to stand at a football game to get a better view then it is rational for everyone to stand at a football game to get a better view" is an example of the fallacy of composition.
The fallacy of composition occurs when we assume that what is true for the parts of a whole is also true for the whole itself. In this case, the statement implies that if it is rational for one person to stand to get a better view, then it must also be rational for everyone to stand. However, this assumption does not hold true because if everyone stands, it would create a situation where nobody gets a better view. Standing might be rational for an individual, but if everyone does it, it leads to a worse outcome for all.
To reach this conclusion, we can analyze the situation using basic logic and reasoning. We can imagine a scenario where everyone at a football game decides to stand to get a better view. However, there is only a limited amount of space available, and not everyone can have an unobstructed view. In this scenario, standing may result in a worse view for everyone. Therefore, assuming that what is rational for one person must be rational for everyone in this context is the fallacy of composition.
Understanding logical fallacies like the fallacy of composition can help improve our critical thinking skills and avoid making faulty assumptions in our reasoning processes.