The dissenting justices disagreed with the majority opinion in the Tinker case because the dissenting justices believed that
The armbands did not disrupt learning.
The armbands did disrupt learning.
The Supreme Court did not have the authority to hear the case.
The dissenting justices believed that the armbands did disrupt learning.
The dissenting justices in the Tinker case disagreed with the majority opinion for a different reason. They believed that the armbands did disrupt learning.
To determine why the dissenting justices disagreed with the majority opinion in the Tinker case, you need to analyze the arguments put forward in the dissenting opinion. Here's a step-by-step guide on how to approach this:
1. Start by reading the majority opinion in the Tinker case. This will give you an understanding of the main arguments and reasoning behind the majority's decision.
2. Next, find and read the dissenting opinion in the same case. Dissenting opinions present the alternative viewpoint and provide a critique of the majority opinion.
3. Look for specific arguments made by the dissenting justices in their opinion. In this case, they believed that the armbands did not disrupt learning. This argument suggests that they disagreed with the majority's assertion that wearing armbands could cause substantial disruption in the educational environment.
4. Additionally, identify any other reasons provided by the dissenting justices for their disagreement with the majority's opinion. In this case, it is possible that the dissenting justices felt that the Supreme Court did not have the authority to hear the case, which challenges the jurisdiction of the court.
By closely examining the arguments in the dissenting opinion, you can determine why the dissenting justices disagreed with the majority opinion in the Tinker case.