Read the following two statements. Then use the Law of Syllogism to draw a conclusion. If Frita goes to the mall, then Alice will go to the mall. If Wally goes to the mall, then Frita will go to the mall. If Alice goes to the mall, then Frita will go to the mall. If Alice goes to the mall, then Wally will go to the mall. If Frita goes to the mall, then Wally will go to the mall. If Wally goes to the mall, then Alice will go to the mall.

Using the Law of Syllogism, we can draw the following conclusion:

If Frita goes to the mall, then Wally will go to the mall.

To use the Law of Syllogism to draw a conclusion based on the given statements, we need to identify two statements that have a common term. Let's analyze the given statements:

Statement 1: If Frita goes to the mall, then Alice will go to the mall.
Statement 2: If Wally goes to the mall, then Frita will go to the mall.
Statement 3: If Alice goes to the mall, then Frita will go to the mall.
Statement 4: If Alice goes to the mall, then Wally will go to the mall.
Statement 5: If Frita goes to the mall, then Wally will go to the mall.
Statement 6: If Wally goes to the mall, then Alice will go to the mall.

From these statements, let's identify two statements that have a common term. Looking at statement 1 and statement 6, we see that both of them involve Alice going to the mall.

Using the Law of Syllogism, we can combine these two statements as follows:
If Frita goes to the mall, then Alice will go to the mall (Statement 1).
If Alice goes to the mall, then Wally will go to the mall (Statement 6).
Therefore, if Frita goes to the mall, then Wally will go to the mall.

In conclusion: If Frita goes to the mall, then Wally will go to the mall.

Let's analyze the given statements and use the Law of Syllogism to draw a conclusion.

Statement 1: If Frita goes to the mall, then Alice will go to the mall.
Statement 2: If Wally goes to the mall, then Frita will go to the mall.
Statement 3: If Alice goes to the mall, then Frita will go to the mall.
Statement 4: If Alice goes to the mall, then Wally will go to the mall.
Statement 5: If Frita goes to the mall, then Wally will go to the mall.
Statement 6: If Wally goes to the mall, then Alice will go to the mall.

Using the Law of Syllogism, we can combine statements 1 and 3 to draw a conclusion:

From statement 1: If Frita goes to the mall, then Alice will go to the mall.
From statement 3: If Alice goes to the mall, then Frita will go to the mall.

By applying the Law of Syllogism, we can infer the following conclusion:

Conclusion: If Frita goes to the mall, then Frita will go to the mall.

Thus, if Frita goes to the mall, it is guaranteed that Frita will go to the mall.

Write this statement as a conditional in if-then form: All triangles have three sides. If a figure is a triangle, then all triangles have three sides. If a figure is a triangle, then it has three sides. If a figure has three sides, then it is not a triangle. If a triangle has three sides, then all triangles have three sides.

If a figure is a triangle, then it has three sides.